More Drivers Should Be Trained To Deal With The Aftermath Of Crashes According To New Survey

More Drivers Should Be Trained To Deal With The Aftermath Of Crashes According To New Survey


More Drivers Should Be Trained To Deal With The Aftermath Of Crashes According To New Survey

– Fifty per cent of people would like post-accident training

– Thirty-nine per cent of people wrongly believe they can be traced by their mobile phone

Eighty-four per cent of people think more drivers should be trained in the skills needed to deal with the aftermath of a road traffic collision, according to a new survey from the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) and Driver First Assist (DFA).

Of the 2198 respondents, 50 per cent said they would like to participate in such training themselves, and 34 per cent were interested in finding out more.

The majority of people, 79 per cent, said that they would stop and help if they arrived at a road traffic collision (RTC) before the emergency services, and 44 per cent have done so already, with a further 10 per cent saying they would if they had received the correct training.

When asked specifically about first aid, 75 per cent would consider stopping to give medical assistance to someone who was injured. Of the respondents:

– A quarter answered that although they hadn’t received any training they still felt they knew enough to make a difference and save someone’s life

– Half of respondents had received some level of training and felt they would be confident enough to put in into practice

– Eighteen per cent answered that they wouldn’t get involved in first aid because they’d be afraid of not knowing what to do or doing the wrong thing.

The survey went on to explore whether people’s hypothetical responses to scenarios matched up with best practice on emergency responses and findings here were mixed. Reassuringly, 78 per cent of the respondents knew that finding a safe place to stop and assess the scene was the most important first step, before dialling 999 or ensuring all those involved are grouped together. Similarly 73 per cent knew that the only time they should park their vehicle to protect a collision was to protect life.

However there were some myths too, with thirty-nine per cent of respondents believing that the emergency services would be able to trace their mobile using GPS to pinpoint their geographical locations, which isn’t the case. And despite a majority suggesting they would try and attempt first aid at the scene, 60 per cent thought that patient movement was not enough to indicate that their heart is beating, which is in fact true.

DFA founder David Higginbottom said: “The fact that nearly half of drivers have come across the scene of a collision before the emergency services arrive clearly demonstrates the potential the motoring public has to help, and individuals’ responses to the survey show how willing they would be to do so.

“A person will die from a blocked airway within four minutes, but the target ambulance response time is twice that. Having a network of volunteers on the road, trained in the skills needed to correctly report a crash to the emergency services, or even to deliver life-saving first aid, has the potential to reduce road deaths by up to forty-six per cent.”

IAM chief executive Simon Best said: “While it’s heartening to see how keen people are to help at a crash, whether or not they had training, the survey also highlighted a number of misconceptions. First aid and giving an accurate report to the emergency services will save lives.  Drivers will be much more useful in this role if they are trained.”

Featured T&L Business
T&L 264
T&L 263
T&L 262